Criminal · Commented case
Investigation for fraudulent concealment of assets and opposition to measures on a property
Anonymized summary · Document examined: opposition to precautionary measures
In an opposition brief, a request for preventive annotation, prohibition of disposal and seizure of income linked to an investigation for alleged seizure of assets was discussed.
What was proposed
The defence argued that the property was still identified and that its connection to a company did not, in itself, prove an intention to defraud. It also discussed the need and extent of the requested measures. These are arguments from that side.
Keys to understand the case
The interest of the case is to separate the examination of the possible crime from the scope of the property measures requested during the procedure. To understand the controversy, assets, shares, income and debts must be distinguished. The opposition does not amount to a declaration of non-existence of a crime nor does it allow us to affirm that the measures were denied.
Documentation to study a similar issue
- Request for measures and opposition.
- Registry and corporate information.
- Documentation of debts, payments and income provided.