Property and matrimonial regimes
Financial need does not determine allocation of liquidation lots
The issue and the court’s approach
Housing need could justify temporary occupation, but not preferential entitlement to the more convenient lot at liquidation. Statutory allocation rules applied, and common partitioner fees were not procedural costs.
Related dictionary concepts
Official source and identification
Supreme Court · Civil Chamber · STS 58/2026 · Appeal 68/2024 · 2026-01-22
Original explanatory note based on the official Civil Chamber weekly summary. This is not a claim to have reviewed the full judgment. The English version is explanatory, not an official translation.
Read the official source (opens in a new tab) ↗
Continue exploring
General information on Spanish law. Application depends on the facts, applicable legislation and subsequent developments.