Use of the family home
Birdnesting: cooperation and financial feasibility
The issue and the court’s approach
The Supreme Court rejected parents alternating in one home because agreement and sufficient resources were lacking. The merits of shared custody did not resolve those problems.
Related dictionary concepts
Official source and identification
Supreme Court · Civil Chamber · STS 427/2026 · 2026-03-17
This is an original explanatory note. The cited material is official supreme court summary / chronicle. Where a summary or study is cited, this note does not claim a full-text review of the judgment.
Read the official source (opens in a new tab) ↗
Continue exploring
General information on Spanish law. Application depends on the facts, applicable legislation and subsequent developments. English text is explanatory, not an official translation.